<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toastmaster&#8217;s Speech about Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticalseeker.com/2010/01/25/toastmasters-speech-about-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticalseeker.com/2010/01/25/toastmasters-speech-about-evolution/</link>
	<description>&#34;Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense.&#34; Carl Sagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lovell</title>
		<link>http://skepticalseeker.com/2010/01/25/toastmasters-speech-about-evolution/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Lovell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistyogi.com/?p=368#comment-104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good subject, nice work!

You said &quot;...The most interesting comment I got was from a lady in the group who is also a preacher (who also gave a very good speech today). She said that I had done well at discussing the issue without dragging too much of the religious controversy into it...&quot;

I wonder why she seems to approve of your not &quot;dragging too much of the religious controversy into it, given that the creation-evolution controversy exists in the first place because of the two opposing points-of-view, one from religion, one from science.  Ah well...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good subject, nice work!</p>
<p>You said &#8220;&#8230;The most interesting comment I got was from a lady in the group who is also a preacher (who also gave a very good speech today). She said that I had done well at discussing the issue without dragging too much of the religious controversy into it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder why she seems to approve of your not &#8220;dragging too much of the religious controversy into it, given that the creation-evolution controversy exists in the first place because of the two opposing points-of-view, one from religion, one from science.  Ah well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

